I am not a student of the television programme Game of Thrones, but from what I understand it bears more
than a passing resemblance to the United States of America between 1870 and 1920, as alliances were struck and
battles were fought to control the wealth of the most powerful nation on the planet. Some even tried their hand at
world domination. Buck Duke, the creator of the American Tobacco Company, tried to corner the market in nicotine,
and although his ambition was thwarted, his assault on the world markets led to the formation of Imperial Tobacco,
to handle Britain and the Empire, and British American Tobacco, to sell to the rest of the world. As well as shaping
the world tobacco market, he endowed Duke University and fathered one of the tragic heroines of the jet set, the
archetypal ‘poor little rich girl’ Doris Duke. During the 20th century, Doris almost became a morality tale in
showing that money could not buy everything. Barbara Hutton, the Woolworth heiress, was another, and she and Duke
even shared a husband, the lively Dominican playboy Porfirio Rubirosa. And in her infancy, Gloria Vanderbilt was the
subject of a bitter and scandalous custody battle between her aunt, the art-loving Gertrude Vanderbilt Whitney, and
her allegedly dissolute bisexual mother, Gloria Morgan Vanderbilt, the twin sister of Thelma Furness, the woman who
preceded Wallis Simpson in the affections of the Duke of Windsor.
Having acquired their money, they spent it in pursuit of what they felt was social polish. Where once sober
brownstones had stood, palatial mansions now lined Fifth Avenue in a riot of architectural styles. The Vanderbilts
constructed half a dozen such 19th-century ‘McMansions’, each a Trump tower of its day, including the awe-inspiring
residence of William Henry Vanderbilt, on the corner of Fifth Avenue and West 51st Street. Apparently unsure as to
whether he wanted to evoke the spirit of ancient Rome, the glories of Renaissance Florence, the exoticism of Japan,
or the culturally enriching effect of a museum, he decided on them all. Other Vanderbilts were equally polyglot in
their decorative tastes: William Kissam Vanderbilt favoured the mock-baronial Merrie England look for his dining
hall, while Cornelius Vanderbilt II was obviously smitten with the Alhambra when it came to commissioning his
smoking room.
These sorts of buildings had an allegorical significance, appropriating the architectural forms of the Old World and
using them to express the supremacy of the new. And one of the chief stylistic plunderers was Stanford White, whose
masterpiece was the old Madison Square Garden (with a tower inspired by the Giralda in Seville), a huge auditorium
suited to horse shows (sponsored by a syndicate including J.P. Morgan) and a place that particularly appealed to
White, a rooftop cabaret where gentlemen could gather to enjoy the latest in light musical comedy. It was here,
during a performance of Mam’zelle Champagne in the middle of the jolly number I Could Love a
Million Girls, that White was gunned down by Harry Kendall Thaw, scion of a coal baron and a jealous husband.
Thaw was a disturbed, sadistic man who had married the former chorus girl Evelyn Nesbit (who had been sexually
assaulted by White when she was 16). Nesbit was the early 20th century It girl who, as an artist’s model, had been
painted nude by one of John Jacob Astor’s favourite contemporary artists and inspired another artist, Charles Dana
Gibson, to create the idealised beauty of the Gilded Age: the so-called Gibson girl. She claimed that White, a
notorious womaniser, had drugged her and taken her virginity in a mirrored room in which there was a red velvet
swing — details that delighted the popular press.
It was rather fitting that White was killed at the theatre, for he and his fellow architects created not homes so
much as social stage sets, the venues for competitively elaborate fancy dress balls. Of course, the walls of these
vast echoing halls needed to be covered, and thus the robber barons discovered art. Frick assembled the works that
are now in the museum that his mansion has become; J.P. Morgan, too, was a collector of almost anything in
industrial quantities — some of it was fake, some of it is now in the Met. And with the acquisition of works of art,
a new arena of competition opened up: one in which these titans of industry were locked in a form of acquisitive
combat that was exploited by men such as the influential art dealer Joseph Duveen, who, it is said, continued to
sell masterpieces to the compulsive collector Henry Goldman even after the founder of Goldman Sachs had gone blind.
The great transatlantic migration of art would continue for a century, resulting in collections such as the one
offered for sale by Christie’s this May.
By 1899, this mania for acquisition had become such a social phenomenon that the University of Chicago sociologist
Thorstein Veblen came up with a name for it. “Conspicuous consumption of valuable goods is a means of reputability
to the gentleman of leisure,” Veblen wrote in his masterpiece of social anthropology, The Theory of the Leisure
Class, which analysed the tastes of the new aristocracy as money begat money and they built their fabulous
sprawling estates, their elaborate “camps” and their monstrous seaside “cottages”.
Gradually, as their money matured, the roughness of their first generations smoothed into a facsimile of European
sophistication. They adopted the leisure pursuits of the Old World elite: William Whitney’s horse won the Epsom
Derby in 1901, following the Prince of Wales in 1899 and the Duke of Westminster in 1900. Their families married
into European nobility: most famously, William K. Vanderbilt’s daughter Consuelo became Duchess of Marlborough. And,
on occasion, a scion of the untitled American aristocracy might even become an Old World nobleman in his own right:
the first Viscount Astor in the Peerage of Great Britain was the great-grandson of the greasy-fingered German fur
trader.
It took the Great Depression and the Second World War to change the world to such an extent that these ruling titans
instead became charming relics of a bygone age, pillars supporting the social edifice of American high society. But
the fascination remained. Writing in a preface to a 1962 edition of his book, three decades after its first
publication, Josephson wrote: “A surprising number of the family dynasties established in the period reviewed in
this book have survived unto the third or fourth generation, and flourish better than ever. Three great foreign wars
in this century have done no harm to the inheritance of the Rockefellers, Duponts, Mellons, Fords and Whitneys — the
value of whose family estates may be reckoned in the billions instead of millions of dollars. Democratic opinion has
apparently become reconciled to the looming presence of these monolithic family fortunes as established features of
the American landscape.”
It was famously said by Ward McAllister, the social arbiter, that four generations were what it took to make a
gentleman. He was wrong… from all accounts of David Rockefeller’s privileged, elegant life, it would appear that the
family that founded Standard Oil achieved it in just three.
This article originally appeared in Issue 57 of The Rake.