“I work in a monastery, in effect,” he says, of his isolated office, where he sits down at 5am, and sketches
through to lunchtime, when he might print out a to-scale image of his latest design, cut it out and wrap it around
his wrist to see how it feels about it. “That’s why I stop properly for lunch and go out. I need to spend time
around some other people. It’s good for ideas too. And the ideas can come from anywhere. I was struggling with one
project the other day and then I saw these amazing cookies, and that was enough to get me thinking afresh about the
dial.”
The Eric Giroud-designed MB&F HM8
Giroud’s success arguably comes precisely from the fact that he’s not obsessed with timepieces - he approaches
designing one of them much as he would any other object, be that a perfume bottle or kitchen knife, objects that
he’s also had commissions to design, along with lighting and mobile phones. It is, he contends, that so many watch
designers come up through the watch industry that they tend to have such a narrow focus; it’s why there’s an endless
run of what he calls “nice but boring” classic designs.
“But, as an independent designer, when you’re designing someone’s house, you have to remember it’s not your house,”
he says. “You can’t impose your own vision of what a watch should look like on every design. You have to design what
the client wants for their customer. Of course, at the end of the day all watch companies tell me they want the same
thing - they want a watch that is ‘beautiful’. Well, OK. But sometimes a really great design is the product of luck.
There’s a magic to the process.”
That’s why Giroud insists he has no design signature, though he does always seek to introduce what he calls “a
certain tension” to every design: he cites an edition of Jaeger Le Coultre’s famed Reverso, one that came with a
bold red dial. “That tension between this modern, atypical colour and what is an old-fashioned looking watch is what
makes it interesting. Look at any iconic watch design and that tension is there.”
Indeed, what he’d really like to design is clothing - with the exception perhaps, of socks, which he almost never
wears, and black, a dour shade he’s never liked, “and I say that as an architect,” he jokes. He says he envies the
greater freedom fashion designers have - to explore combinations of shapes, colours and materials - even if his
style is rather minimalistic and masculine, with the occasional giving vent to his love of Gallic stripes. “And, as
someone who designs watches every day, which can feel like you’re doing the same thing all the time, you need to
have your mind opened by looking at the way other design works,” he says. “I need to restart like a computer now and
then. I need to go clothes shopping.”
“Really every product has its own design criteria,” Giroud explains, “and, of course, a watch is something you wear
too, and that’s regardless of how crazy the look of the watch may be - it has to be something you can put on. It’s
also very small. It’s a limited canvas to work on. And it usually has to be waterproof, so there are technical
limitations too. In fact it’s easy to design a watch that looks good on paper. But I know a design has to work in 3D
- and that’s very different. It’s like seeing a shirt in a magazine and thinking ‘wow!’. And then you get it on and
it’s ‘no, no, no!’.”
Is watch design getting better? Might we be tempted to step away from the watch world’s design icons in favour of
something more progressive, more interesting, less historical? Giroud says there’s been a sea-change over the last
decade, in large part because of a flurry of new, internet-enabled brands, “so it’s getting harder to stand out
without good design,” he stresses.
“That said,” he adds, “when I go to present a design - when I’m looking for that light in their eyes, or not -
often there’s still not that much said about it. All anyone really wants to talk about is the celebrity attached to
the launch, or the movement. All that talk of tourbillons and complex mechanisms. I sit in the car after a meeting
and think ‘what was that all about?’.”
